Overheard at UC Berkeley

Were certain youve all accomplished this previously. Regardless of whether youre strolling a few doors down or joining a gathering at the feasting lobby, youre bound to listen to something of setting, improper, or cleverly abnormal that causes you to do a twofold take. is gathering the most elite from every school grounds. Today, we take you insideUC Berkeley.At the feasting corridors: Are you a greater amount of Hufflepuff or Ravenclaw (Twitter: @jcstoy) The unmistakable decision is consistently Gryffindor. At the Career Center: A business shared, In interviews I like to request that up-and-comers spell their names backwards.This is a barbarous, pitiless game for dyslexic understudies. In a Cal bio class: What if the entirety of this is ****conspiracy man (Twitter: @BeatricePopesc)What if cells arent cells?! Imagine a scenario where DNA isnt actually a twofold helix yet they simply need to make it doubly hard for us. Out on the quad: Is it fetty wob, or fetty wap (Twitter: @Elijschwartz)Uhh Hey, whats up? Hi. In OChem survey: Dude Im so going to drop out of school and sell drugs (Twitter: @BeatricePopesc)Man, that is terrible Breaking awful. Some basic room: Im going to send you a terrified email about my task at some point this week. (Twitter: @Soundslikepuget)If youve never had a fit of anxiety over a school venture, congrats. You have your coexistence more than all of us. All things considered, there you have it! Do you go to Cal? Leave us a remark and let us comprehend what else youve caught nearby. Well update our blog with your entries.

Miles City Montana By Munro Essays - Point Of View, Style

Miles City Montana By Munro The dreariness of life has battled against the storyteller in Alice Munro's Miles City, Montana. The creator delineates the storyteller as a fragile lady in search of an individual personality among a network of similarity. This fight between residential duty and individual fulfillment stinks devastation on the trooper of this mother and spouse. Munro is an ace of portrayal, and through the hero she delineates the complexities of human instinct. Presently, as the group of four goes over the landmass, the storyteller can bog off all the commitments which society has dumped on her. Nearly mitigated, we shed our home, the area, the city, and...our nation (378). On the street, she is not, at this point compelled to escape the amicable calls or family unit tasks. The storyteller has been liberated on the thruway to Ontario, Canada. The Wartime captive, held under attack in her own house, is freed to be cheerful also, happy (378). This excursion turns into a break from the existence that she's is at present driving, a real existence which society thinks should make her substance. With this new piece of opportunity the storyteller can shape a character for herself. Catastrophe, be that as it may, nearly strikes as the storyteller enjoys this reprieve from the real world. As the family arrives at Miles City, Montana, the two little youngsters become dazzled by the idea of swimming in an invigorating pool. No grown-ups are out loud into the pool zone during the mid-day break, yet the kids are as yet ready to take a dip with the lifeguard present. As the storyteller ventures far out, the most youthful young lady's interest catches her, and she nearly suffocates in the pool. Meg had almost lowered before the mother had a dubious hunch that something on this evening is extremely off-base. Running toward the pool, the young lady's folks contact her in time, however this episode leaks a lot further as the mother gains knowledge and personality from the experience. She is a mother. The storyteller has now acknowledged this duty, and will most likely grasp different commitments inside her locale. As the storyteller and her significant other examine which course to take on the path back to Vancouver, she is loaded up with help (388) at the idea of home. That which was a jail before this portentous get-away has gotten a haven, and there is an amazing delight (388) inside this idea. Reference index Meyer, Michael. The Compact Bedford Introduction to Literature. 5 ed. Bedford Books. 1997.

Social Comparison Theory in Psychology

Social Comparison Theory in Psychology Theories Social Psychology Print Social Comparison Theory in Psychology By Kendra Cherry facebook twitter Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Learn about our editorial policy Kendra Cherry Updated on September 23, 2019 Nicholas Prior / Stone / Getty Images More in Theories Social Psychology Behavioral Psychology Cognitive Psychology Developmental Psychology Personality Psychology Biological Psychology Psychosocial Psychology We all compare ourselves to others in our social worlds, whether it is comparing our looks to those of celebrities we see in the media or our talents to those of our co-workers. In psychology, social comparison theory is one explanation for this tendency we have to make comparisons between ourselves and others. Lets take a closer look at how social comparison theory works and how the comparison we make influence the views we may hold of ourselves. Social Comparison Theory Background Social comparison theory was first proposed in 1954 by psychologist Leon Festinger and suggested that people have an innate drive to evaluate themselves, often in comparison to others. People make all kinds of judgments about themselves, and one of the key ways that we do this is through social comparison, or analyzing the self in relation to others. For example, imagine that a high school student has just signed up for band class to learn how to play the clarinet. As she evaluates her skills and progress, she will compare her performance to other students in the class. She might initially compare her abilities to the other members of the clarinet section, particularly noting those who are better than her as well as those who are worse. She may also compare her abilities to those of students who play other instruments as well. Psychologist Leon Festinger believed that we engage in this comparison process as a way of establishing a benchmark by which we can make accurate evaluations of ourselves. For example, a music student might compare herself to the star student of the class. If she finds that her abilities do not measure up to her peers talents, she might be driven to achieve more and improve her abilities. How Does the Social Comparison Process Work? The social comparison process involves people coming to know themselves by evaluating their own attitudes, abilities, and beliefs in comparison with others. In most cases, we try to compare ourselves to those in our peer group or with whom we are similar. There are two kinds of social comparison: Upward Social Comparison This takes place when we compare ourselves with those who we believe are better than us. These upward comparisons often focus on the desire to improve our current level of ability. We might compare ourselves to someone better off and look for ways that we can also achieve similar results. Downward Social Comparison This takes place  when we compare themselves to others who are worse off than ourselves. Such downward comparisons are often centered on making ourselves feel better about our abilities. We might not be great at something, but at least we are better off than someone else. People compare themselves to those who are better when they want inspiration to improve, and compare themselves to those who are worse when they want to feel better about themselves. How to Stop Comparing Yourself to Others Examples of Social Comparison Theory in Action According to Festinger, people rely on these comparisons with other people to accurately assess their own skills, abilities, beliefs, and attitudes. In cases where your comparisons are not effective, you might find yourself getting into situations that are too difficult or complex for your current skill levels. For example, if you compare yourself to your friends and feel that you are pretty physically fit, you might sign up for a marathon believing that you have the ability to finish with no problem. When race day arrives, you might find yourself surrounded by people who are much more athletic than you and realize that your initial assessment of your abilities was overly optimistic. When we can, we may put these comparisons to the test in real-world settings. Upward Comparison For example, if you want to assess your skill as a basketball player, you might start by playing a game with your friends or practice shooting free throws. Once you have a good understanding of what you are capable of, you might then begin comparing your performance to other people that you know. You might immediately think of a friend who plays on his schools basketball team. This is an example of upward social comparison. Downward Comparison In comparison to him, your performance is not nearly as skilled, but you might feel that you can eventually achieve a similar skill with a little practice. In this case, the upward social comparison may make you feel better about your skill and more motivated to improve upon it. You might then compare your abilities to a friend who couldnt make a basket to save his life. In comparison, your performance is much better. This is an example of downward social comparison. In this case, observing your friend’s poor skills actually makes you feel even better about your own abilities. Some comparisons might make you feel inadequate and less likely to pursue a goal while others give  you confidence and help boost your self-esteem. A Word From Verywell Social comparison plays a role in the judgments that people make about themselves but also in the way that people behave. As you compare yourself to others, consider how both upward and downward social comparison might influence your self-belief, confidence, motivation, and attitude and watch out for negative feelings that might emerge as a result of this process. How Social Media Comparisons Can Create Stress

Platos Atlantis as Told in His Socratic Dialogues

The original story of the lost island of Atlantis comes to us from two Socratic dialogues called Timaeus and Critias, both written about 360 BCE by the Greek philosopher Plato. Together the dialogues are a festival speech, prepared by Plato to be told on the day of the Panathenaea, in honor of the goddess Athena. They describe a meeting of men who had met the previous day to hear Socrates describe the ideal state. A Socratic Dialogue According to the dialogues, Socrates asked three men to meet him on this day: Timaeus of Locri, Hermocrates of Syracuse, and Critias of Athens. Socrates asked the men to tell him stories about how ancient Athens interacted with other states. The first to report was Critias, who told how his grandfather had met with the Athenian poet and lawgiver  Solon, one of the Seven Sages. Solon had been to Egypt where priests had compared Egypt and Athens and talked about the gods and legends of both lands. One such Egyptian story was about Atlantis. The Atlantis tale is part of a  Socratic dialogue, not a historical treatise. The story is preceded by an account of Helios the sun gods son Phaethon yoking horses to his fathers chariot and then driving them through the sky and scorching the earth. Rather than exact reporting of past events, the Atlantis story describes an impossible set of circumstances which were designed by Plato to represent how a miniature utopia failed and became a lesson to us defining the proper behavior of a state. The Tale According to the Egyptians, or rather what Plato described Critias reporting what his grandfather was told by Solon who heard it from the Egyptians, once upon a time, there was a mighty power based on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. This empire was called Atlantis, and it ruled over several other islands and parts of the continents of Africa and Europe. Atlantis was arranged in concentric rings of alternating water and land. The soil was rich, said Critias, the engineers technically accomplished, the architecture extravagant with baths, harbor installations, and barracks. The central plain outside the city had canals and a magnificent irrigation system. Atlantis had kings and a civil administration, as well as an organized military. Their rituals matched Athens for bull-baiting, sacrifice, and prayer. But then it waged an unprovoked imperialistic war on the remainder of Asia and Europe. When Atlantis attacked, Athens showed its excellence as the leader of the Greeks, the much smaller city-state the only power to stand against Atlantis. Alone, Athens triumphed over the invading Atlantean forces, defeating the enemy, preventing the free from being enslaved, and freeing those who had been enslaved. After the battle, there were violent earthquakes and floods, and Atlantis sank into the sea, and all the Athenian warriors were swallowed up by the earth. Is Atlantis Based on a Real Island? The Atlantis story is clearly a parable: Platos myth is of two cities which compete with each other, not on legal grounds but rather cultural and political confrontation and ultimately war. A small but just city (an Ur-Athens) triumphs over a mighty aggressor (Atlantis). The story also features a cultural war between wealth and modesty, between a maritime and an agrarian society, and between an engineering science and a spiritual force. Atlantis as a concentric-ringed island in the Atlantic which sank under the sea is almost certainly a fiction based on some ancient political realities. Scholars have suggested that the idea of Atlantis as an aggressive barbarian civilization is a reference to either Persia or Carthage, both of them military powers who had imperialistic notions. The explosive disappearance of an island might have been a reference to the eruption of Minoan Santorini. Atlantis as a tale really should be considered a myth, and one that closely correlates with Platos notions of The Republic examining the deteriorating cycle of life in a state. Sources DuÃ… ¡anic S. 1982. Platos Atlantis. LAntiquità © Classique 51:25-52.Morgan KA. 1998. Designer History: Platos Atlantis Story and Fourth-Century Ideology. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 118:101-118.Rosenmeyer TG. 1956. Platos Atlantis Myth: Timaeus or Critias? Phoenix 10(4):163-172.

Analysis Of Beth Johnson s Bombs Bursting Into Air

Background Born in 1956, Beth Johnson is a mother of three and the author of multiple dominant pieces such as Facing Addiction (2006) and Surviving Abuse (2006). She lives in Lederach, Pennsylvania and her occupations include writing, freelance editor, and college professor. Johnson graduated from Goshen College and Syracuse University. Her writing mainly focuses on encouraging readers to accomplish their personal goals as well as college texts such as Everyday Heroes (1996). Summary â€Å"Bombs bursting in air. They can blind us, like fireworks at the moment of explosion. If we close our eyes and turn away, all we see is the fiery image. But if we have the courage to keep our eyes open and welcoming, even bombs finally fade against the vastness of the starry sky â€Å"(15). â€Å"Bombs Bursting in Air† begins with the narrator talking about her son’s game and her daughter acting silly while singing the national anthem. More specifically, the line â€Å"Bombs bursting in air.† The author gives the word â€Å"bombs† a whole new definition in this essay. Rather than meaning an explosive weapon often used in war, Johnson refers to the difficult obstacles people face everyday. The more one risks a person takes results in more of life’s destructible bombs. These obstacles explode unexpectedly, and that is exactly what happened to Shannon. Shannon is five years old and is the author’s daughter’s best friend. Doctors f ound a brain tumor when she went to get an x-ray for a sledding accident. After

Usain Bolt Free Essays

Usain Bolt Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt is arguably the fastest man in the world, winning three gold medals at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China, and becoming the first man in Olympic history to win both the 100-meter and 200-meter races in record times. Bolt won his fourth Olympic gold medal in the men’s 100-meter race at the 2012 Summer Olympic Games in London, beating rival Yohan Blake, who took silver. Bolt ran the race in 9. We will write a custom essay sample on Usain Bolt or any similar topic only for you Order Now 63 seconds, a new Olympic record, making him the first man in history to set three world records in a single Olympic Games competition. The win marked Bolt’s second consecutive gold medal in the 100. Bolt went on to compete in the men’s 200, claiming his second consecutive gold medal in that race. He is the first man to win both the 100 and 200 at consecutive Olympic Games, as well as the first man to ever win back-to-back gold medals in double sprints. Usain Bolt was born in Jamaica on August 21, 1986. Both a standout cricket player and a sprinter early on, Bolt’s natural speed was noticed by coaches at school, As early as age 14, Bolt was wowing fans of sprinting with his lightning speed, and he won his first high school championships medal in 2001, taking the silver in the 200-meter race. Bolt announced that he would run the 100-meter and 200-meter events at the Beijing Summer Olympics. In the 100-meter final, Bolt broke the world record, winning in 9. 69 seconds. Not only was the record set without a favorable wind, but he also visibly slowed down to celebrate before he finished (and his shoelace was untied), an act that aroused much controversy later on. Bolt’s achievements in sprinting have earned him numerous awards, including the IAAF World Athlete of the Year (twice), Track Field Athlete of the Year and Laureus Sportsman of the Year. How to cite Usain Bolt, Papers

John Proctor in The Crucible free essay sample

In the Crucible John Proctor is a man of many characters that lead to how we interpret his choices. Proctor believes himself as a tormented individual that leads him to believe he is damaged in the eyes of God from how he mistreated his wife and had an affair with Abigail. This is going to lead him to believe he has a flaw, or what would be called if you were reading, a character flaw which is another way of saying John Proctor is a Tragic Hero. He is a Tragic Hero.Proctor is overwhelmed by the fatal flaw that made him eventually succumb to his death. Pride is a huge role in Proctors life throughout the crucible. As spoken by a proctor at the end of the play, â€Å"Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worthy of the dust on the feet of them that hang; Leave my name,† (Miller 143). We will write a custom essay sample on John Proctor in The Crucible or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Proctor refused to testify against Abigail during the trials to prevent his name from being blackened. It is easy to understand where he struggles, he cares so much for what his name is and for being a noble character but because of his pride and his internal difficulties with his conscience his hubristic mindset is what caused his downfall.Pride is one of the deadly seven sins, in Act IV this will be covered as you continue to read on into the book. Hale urged everyone that in order to save your life, you need to confess to your sins and what you have done wrong. While speaking with Elizabeth have told her â€Å"It may well be God damns a liar less than he that who throws his life away for pride,† (Miller 132). Hale wanted Proctor to confess to his lies to save his life and meet ends with his mistakes. Proctor does not find the courage to confess to his sins due to not wanting to blacken his name but as time goes on he will end up revealing his sins and that will put an end to his life. Hale was pouring out his emotions particularly when Proctor was being hung, â€Å"Woman, plead with him! Woman! It is pride, it is vanity. Be his helper! What profit him to bleed? Shall dust praise him† (Miller 145) Hale’s conscience is very aware that Proctor is completely innocent of the accusing’s of him being involved in witchcraft? Hale values life and pities Proctor in his own attempt to be able to save his life . Hale always had the conclusion that Proctor was a pure and innocent man.